-
DJWhaters posted in the group Everything Harder with Style
Mastering vs Non-Mastering
So we all make music, we’re all pretty good at it too and making those sounds And placing them in a track to make something epic, those tracks are playable and I’m sure most of the average listeners would know the difference between the 2 versions.
But… I’ve just had my “make it England” track mastered, I like to do a blind listen of the 2 versions to see what my ears & my brain hear, instantly i can hear the sounds differently and my speakers are jacked up a little more on the mastered version and still no distortion
Next test is visual looking at the waveforms and it’s clear to see the difference and where the sounds have been dipped and other sounds brought forward in the mix
My only problem is why didn’t i notice that when i made it? Maybe ear fatigue or because i have heard so many versions making it.
However I also know in the back of my mind that when I’ve made a track I’m going to get it professionally mastered and maybe I don’t worry so much as I should because i don’t need to?
Either way if you’ve been considering getting a track mastered then take my word for it that it’s worth it.7 Comments-
Look at how beautiful the core of the track got flat-lined but still dynamics in the track peaks. Yours is not consistent at the core, but flat-lined at the dynamics. so its the opposite. So there is your answer
-
-
This happens again and again with my tracks as well Ian 🙃 I strongly believe that one is simply to biased to polish / master one’s own pieces to ‚perfection‘. And perfection was really good explained in a baking book I read recently in something you achieve, not by adding something but when nothing cannot be reduced anymore. And since you are your biggest enemy only another master can pinpoint easily what needs to be done to polish that art 🤘